Currently, people who work in several ‘mini-jobs’ may not earn enough from one of those jobs to build a state pension. The lower earnings limit is £5,700, which means an employee must currently earn more than that in one job alone.
Labour peer Baroness Hollis of Heigham this week narrowly secured the amendment after the House of Lords voted 215 for the proposal with 210 against. She said the increase in zero hours contracts, together with other short-hours contracts and flexible working arrangements means 40% of all jobs are flexible or irregular. She called the inability to qualify for a state pension “the dark side of the flexible labour economy”.
“This amendment seeks to put a pension floor under workers who may work in several mini-jobs and put in quite long hours—30 or so a week—but who cannot, under rules set out decades ago, build themselves a new state pension. If they are in one job with sufficient pay they will build a state pension, but if they are in several jobs with identical pay they do not,” she said.
“Part-time work and flexible work may suit, and does suit, many women, students or older people on a pension. Our pension structure, both state and private, has not yet caught up. It is 10 or 15 years behind as the plates shift in the labour market.”
Baroness Hollis estimated that 250,000 people could be affected and urged the government to use the amendment to act. “In the past, we were told that their pay could not be aggregated for national insurance purposes because you could not divi [sic] up employers’ national insurance among different employers and that, in any case, the numbers were small, were temporary, were declining and UC [Universal Credit] would sort it. Not one of those statements do I believe to be true, and we need to rethink the issue.”
Image credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/uk_parliament/